First of all, Happy 2024 everyone!

(I very much doubt it with everything that’s going on, but it can’t hurt to wish it, right?)

We’re starting off the New Year with a post prompted by a very common phenomenon, in my experience: trainees are often at a loss when it comes to how their performance is assessed and what grade they should be able to achieve, based on their performance on the course.

This results in two broad categories of misconceptions, depending on the trainees’ personality, the amount of explicit feedback they get on the course and, of course, their rapport with their tutors.

Category 1: I can’t get it right, no matter what I do

These trainees constantly underestimate themselves, are in fear of failing the course and refuse to stop worrying about it, even in the face of very positive feedback from the course tutors. This is not as rare as you might think, especially when it comes to trainees being perfectionists and/or high achievers, either by character or by necessity. This is not uncommon in a labour market that has become very competitive and increasingly insecure! People think they have to be perfect in order to secure a decent teaching position.

Category 2: I deserved a better grade

This is admittedly a larger category, as many tutors can testify! These trainees may have a very high opinion of their teaching skills and language expertise. This is not necessarily unjustified, nor is it solely due to their being over-confident by nature. Some trainees may have achieved high academic grades or have even excelled in a variety of teaching environments, although normally this would entail courses that are either academically focused or traditionally very T-centred, or both. Other trainees may have little teaching experience and cannot understand what is needed in order to pass the course; I have even encountered candidates who believed that paying the course fees automatically ensured their passing.

So, what do you do?

Both of these seemingly very different types of trainees have two things in common:

• They can both feel very demotivated and disappointed throughout the course. This is a very real hurdle in their development, as they either try too hard or not enough in some cases. It may also have a negative impact on the other trainees on the course, if there is a constant climate of confusion and uncertainty.
• They have not been given clear, explicit feedback as to what the course grading criteria are and how they translate in their individual cases, other than the standard CELTA5 page.

Needless to say, in both cases, it can be useful to clarify the grading criteria during individual tutorials, so that trainees have a clearer picture of where they stand and what they need to do in order to pass the course or achieve a higher grade.

This is post is targeted at current or future CELTA trainees, who enter the course with certain expectations regarding their performance and the grade they should achieve. I would use it during individual tutorials throughout the course to help raise trainee awareness as to how the grading criteria meet their course expectations. In that sense, it may be helpful to tutors as well! So here it is.

In the following table, I’ve tried to break down the performance descriptors - the grading criteria, in simple English – set by Cambridge into more digestible bits by using simpler, trainee-friendly language.

Is this table crystal clear? Probably not!

Is it clearer than the relevant page on the CELTA 5 course record that trainees receive?

I should say yes!

Does it raise trainee awareness of what they need to achieve in order to get the desired grade? In my experience, again yes!

So, if you are/were a trainee, would this table give you a clear idea as to what is needed for a higher grade?

As a trainer, would you find this useful?

As usual, please let me know what you think in the comments , and feel free to offer suggestions for improvement.